Back in 1943, Aunt Edith and Cousin Robert saw to it that John Ringling North was listed as John R. North in the souvenir program. (Later during their tenure, it was shortened to just John North.)
On the other hand, perhaps John Ringling North II doesn’t want his circus to be associated with the Ringling name, considering the type of performance the Felds are offering under it.
If the Felds have disgraced every name they have claim to, Ringling, Barnum, Bailey, Hagenbeck-Wallace, Sells-Floto, et al, my entertainment lawyer friend insists they have no position to deny John Ringling North II the use of the name to which he was born.
This has been discussed before here, and it is assured the Felds have a place of lasting disgust among the names of show owners.
A friend of mine suggested that there may have been a clause in the original contract with JRN, Sr. that precluded any heirs in using the Ringling name for any future publicity. I doubt if anyone other than the Feld's or JRN, II really knows for sure. ~frank
Hey, folks, look at the photo a few down of the ticket wagon on K-M, afew down from this poster: "John Ringling North II Proprietor." And I recall seeing it on several other trailers when I caught the show. Dick Flint Baltimore
I doubt if John Ringling North owned the full rights to the Ringling name, there being other members of the family, which is to say he probably didn't have the authority to bargain away other family members' rights to using the name.
13 comments:
Is there a story behind his using his middle initial R instread of Ringling?
It might have something to do with Feld Entertainment's previous threat of litigation.
I thought he had stared 'em down in that dustup.
Can't you use you own name?
Dick Loter named his son Richard Barnum so the kid could grow up and call his show Barnum's Circus.
Now THAT'S a Circus poster! It's a sad state of affairs when a guy can't even use his own name though! ~frank
Back in 1943, Aunt Edith and Cousin Robert saw to it that John Ringling North was listed as John R. North in the souvenir program. (Later during their tenure, it was shortened to just John North.)
On the other hand, perhaps John Ringling North II doesn’t want his circus to be associated with the Ringling name, considering the type of performance the Felds are offering under it.
If the Felds have disgraced every name they have claim to, Ringling, Barnum, Bailey, Hagenbeck-Wallace, Sells-Floto, et al, my entertainment lawyer friend insists they have no position to deny John Ringling North II the use of the name to which he was born.
This has been discussed before here, and it is assured the Felds have a place of lasting disgust among the names of show owners.
Again, "John Ringling...or "R" North is simply a statement of ownership...not the title of the Circus.
Yes Jimmy but
We all know that the name
Ringling is still synonamous
with circus everywhere and
having that name anywhere on
the ad or sheet has value
as it still catches the eye
A friend of mine suggested that there may have been a clause in the original contract with JRN, Sr. that precluded any heirs in using the Ringling name for any future publicity. I doubt if anyone other than the Feld's or JRN, II really knows for sure. ~frank
Jerry Sowalsky would know
Hey, folks, look at the photo a few down of the ticket wagon on K-M, afew down from this poster: "John Ringling North II Proprietor." And I recall seeing it on several other trailers when I caught the show.
Dick Flint
Baltimore
I doubt if John Ringling North owned the full rights to the Ringling name, there being other members of the family, which is to say he probably didn't have the authority to bargain away other family members' rights to using the name.
THIS JUST IN TO OUR NEWS DESK -
US Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor concurs with the honorable Mr. Holmes. -30- ~frank
Post a Comment