Wednesday, August 20, 2008

"Quaggas" From Richard Flint)


ZI 1835 poster, originally uploaded by bucklesw1.

The first known quagga arrived in the US in July 1833 as part of a
large group of several dozen animals brought over from Africa on board
the ship Triton by Zebedee Macomber, the first of three such
expeditions he made. Macomber next returned in May 1834 with a
shipment of 70 animals including four quaggas. When the famed
Zoological Institute merged all of the menageries in America for the
1835 season, at least one surviving quagga appeared with their
principal unit, one of 13 menageries they toured that year. Shown
here is a huge poster (remarkably, one of four copies that survive)
that is 9-foot high for that very unit of the 1835 Zoological
Institute. Note the woodblock under the bold "Rhino" for it is their
quagga.

The last exhibited quagga I know of is one is advertised in 1840 on
the Grand Menagerie owned by James Raymond (Joseph E.M. Hobby,
manager). After the 1830s, of course, traveling menageries are no
longer the great enterprises they once had been.

The quagga, quite common into the mid-19th century, was quickly hunted
to extinction because its hide was desirable and it competed with
farmer's stock for grazing land. Nevertheless, some enterprising
showman tried to keep the quagga in front of the American public even
though the last quagga, who had outlived any of his brethren by
several years, died in an Amsterdam zoo in 1883. However, it should
be stated that the term quagga was indiscriminately applied to various
zebras and, in a sense, the animal became extinct before it was
generally realized, thus leading to some understandable confusion in
later claims by showmen.

Adam Forepaugh, Jr., accompanied a large importation of animals from
Europe in late December 1882 (including five elephants) that
supposedly included a quagga. This supposed quagga—trained to drive
in double harness with a zebra—fell during a storm at sea, broke its
back, had to be destroyed, and was thus thrown overboard according to
a press account.

Bostock's Zoo, which spent the winter of 1899-1900 exhibiting here in
Baltimore, somehow offered quagga rides to local visitors. In
addition, the Zoo had clown Bobby Mack with several trained animals
including his unrideable mule Dynamite as well as a trained "quagga."

Recent DNA analysis has revealed that the quagga is not a separate
species but another variety of zebra. Consequently, there have been
efforts to reintroduce a quagga by selective breeding. To learn more,
blog readers can visit on the
internet.

Perhaps Ringling might add two quaggas to the attractive new mixed act
of paired zebras and horses which Karen Houcke has been nicely
rehearsing on the red show. Given the beautiful combination of
animals she has been working that, hopefully, will be on the new show,
the appearance and colors of a quagga would be a harmoniously stunning
and unusual inclusion that might gain more appreciative press coverage
than rambunctious runaway zebras sometimes generate.

Dick Flint
Baltimore

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dick - -Good summary of the facts as we know them about quaggas in the USA.

Also the information from Beheim (with photos) is quite good and accurate as far as I can tell.

The two photos were taken at London Zoo by Frederick York, most likely in 1870. There are five known photos of this mare, the only ones ever taken of a living quagga as far as I know. These two are the ones most frequently published. All five photos are reproduced in John Edwards remarkable >>London Zoo From Old Photographs<< (1996). It is a must for the animal enthusiast.

I would be skeptical of references to later quaggas in menageries. I think the Bostock animal was a hybrid (zebra x domestic ass).

I think the disappearance of the quagga was a case of the farmers in the Cape Provinces of South Africa coming to ask one another, “I haven’t seen a quagga in months and months, have you?”

In other words it was gone before they realized it, though they had hunted it mercilessly. A similar story was told here in the late 19th and early 20th century about the passenger pigeon and Carolina parakeet.

Anonymous said...

An account of a Sands, Nathans & Co. parade in New York City about 1859 also noted a quagga in the march.

Anonymous said...

To anonymous: I would appreciate more precise information about the quagga supposedly in the Sands, Nathans march. They were a circus show and not so much a menagerie. In 1857 they did have two trained zebras and perhaps some newspaperman mis-reported what he saw paraded in NYC.
Dick Flint
Baltimore

Fred Neill said...

Barnum & Bailey - bless 'em! were advertising one as in UK for their visits.As Richard Reynolds said, likely also a zebra/donkey though you'd never know it from the Press team's offerings! After all, if other large US show had one so did Barnum - sadly, in those days the public would not have known the difference anyway.
Having said that, Regents Park zoo, London did not seem to comment on any of the "Barnumisms" that toured here....

Anonymous said...

Barnum & Bailey did indeed have a zebra hitch, and it included two of the very rare Burchell’s zebras with white legs and tail. There are several photos of them in parade. But they were not the true quaggas