Tuesday, February 19, 2008

From Merle Evans to Irvin Feld


Scan000010874, originally uploaded by bucklesw1.

Mr. Evans making finale during the final years of the Ringling Show under canvas accompanied by these articles concerning Mr. Feld's involvement immediately following the transition to Ball Parks and Arenas.


1) "Ringling-Barnum on Trucks Season of 1957" by Fred Pfening in the July-August 1994 issue, pages 4-15, quotes the July 8, 1957, Billboard saying the the Feld brothers had a "very successful" Roanoke date on July 2-3 and they would know the following week whether they would be associated with future Ringling dates. The Felds also promoted the Washington, D.C., stand at Griffith Stadium, the first time outdoor rigging was used. The Bandwagon article states that Harry S. Dube, longtime program publisher, was the unlikely appointee to handle booking for the 1957 sesson. Harry Lashinsky, a friend of Rudy Bundy, was consulted though he did not book any engagements that first season. Lashinsky later did became an important promoter and might have been a potential buyer of the show except he was reaping success in the late '60s with his horse show, a big winner in buildings across the US that made him and his sons wealthy.

2) A 1973 Interview with Art Concello by Tom Parkinson in the September-October 2001 issue, pages 7-28: This is a thorough Q&A with questions by the former circus editor of Billboard. Concello reveals that the show, short of money, did not have the money to hire its own promoters those first couple of years and, says Concello, it would have taken a few years to get them experienced to be successful. So experienced outside promoters were used except for about 12 weeks that were promoted by buildings themselves (MSG, etc.) and the following outside promoters were used--Feld and Harry Lashinsky got about 15 dates each as the seasons wore on and Martell Brett had 10-12 while Warner Buck got 5-6 west coast dates. Concello, the man in charge with North in Europe, answered Parkinson's direct question about Feld having any different deal: "Feld wanted them all. I said Oh, s---, you ain't never gonna get me in a position where you get them all. So I never would let Feld have over fifteen towns." Nor would he have allowed others such as Lashinsky for he was one smart operator.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wowser. The current owners rewriting history. I'm shocked. If the Mr. Feld didn't save the circus from the shambles of tented age, what chance do the current Feld sisters have of saving the circus from the shambles of three rings?

henry edgar said...

the saddest thing about all this is that irvin feld put together some great shows, although not necessarily any bigger or better than north. the "saving the circus" myth will unfortunately mar his credibility in the overall history of the circus in america, as well as the future place in history of many others involved since they seemed to also believe all this even though they should have known better. even many feld favorites among performers seem to have delusions about their acts as opposed to acts of the past, with the notable exceptions of a few who realized that no matter what they might read, others had done similar acts before and often the same tricks. remember about a year ago when a ringling manager mentioned the mesh arena as a "new this year" innovation? the feld legacy has much to brag about without trying to rewrite history.

henry edgar said...

i just remembered two things the current feld management can very honestly brag about. kenny feld has without any doubt done more to save the indian elephant for circuses of the future than anyone else. i will forever respect him for this and we all shound be grateful for his efforts. this has earned him a place in circus history no matter what other mistakes he may have made.

the second is that under his leadership, ringling has been much more profitable probably than even the original brothers ever dreamed. and, as much as we like to talk about the prices, his ticklet prices and concessions are no higher than most other entertainment events today.

Anonymous said...

There seems to be much more ink available touting the Feld rescue if the GSOE than there was written about the fiscal struggles of the North era.
And if there is anything taught to this generation by our current media moguls, it is that as long as you say it louder, longer and often enough , it becomes acceppted as fact, no matter what the facts are.
But isn't that what promoters and press agents are for ?

Anonymous said...

Henry's right. All kidding aside when it comes to mythology, Ken Feld deserves enormous credit for C.E.C., and Irvin Feld did produce a great circus. The tendency to inflate the importance,or originality of all things RBBB didn't start with the present owners. I suspect there were RBBB folks who would have claimed in 1930 that they'd saved the Corporation shows.

Anonymous said...

I'm not a shareholder so I don't care about their profitablity.

You'd be hardpressed to find another entertainment facility that has $12 cotton candy and $15 snow cones and $18 souvenir photos.
I know my prices because I take the family (multi-generational) all the time, walk through the front door with tickets I purchased ($35.each) and sit through the show hoping that some member of my family will be enchanted with the GSOE as I once was.
Unfortunately, that is not going to happen as evident by the young folks whipping out their iPods during intermisson, not impressed by the production that they just saw.
Yes, we've been to Disney, Sea World, Six Flags, etc, etc, etc. My entertainment world is not myopic.

Regarding iPods which I don't understand, younger folk told me they are a little thing you hold in your hand, then you put on your earphones and then you hear music, "This is the newest thing, ain't it cool?
I replied, "No, when I was your age I had a transistor radio that did the same thing."

Anonymous said...

henry edgar,
Most people who witnessed the Blue Show 1984-1985 edition's will disagree with your statement, "although not necessarily any bigger or better than North." And that is no "delusion" Henry. LOL. I think the Ringling manager was referencing the net arena, having no ring curb, and being raised to the ceiling frame, not that the net arena was a new innovation.
As Mr. Feld was more visual, and public it stand's to reason that he would receive most of the credit for the "saving". You are a publicist Henry, and you must agree it is difficult to promote a "ghost".

Buckles,
I found the Lashinsky name interesting. Is this Lippisan show Lashinsky's father?

Lad,
I have been stressing a good Pr department/agent for the past year, my friend. It is a newly learned fact for me, and probably one of the most valuable I have learned in many year's of this deal. Sadly for us, we didn't become aware of it's importance 15 years ago. Towner's are just slow getting it, I guess.
Wade Burck

P.S. Larry, how's about we start with today's new history lesson. The crazy profitability Henry mention's, only started happening when Feld lightened the payroll by releasing both of us within a few year's of each other. If you like it, we should stick with it.

Anonymous said...

I wonder how much Merle got paid to blow the cornet, lead the band, arrange the music, and wear that headress that would have scared the savages? Tremendous trouper, great musician, a legend amongst msuci men in his own time and thereafter. Lunch?