OLD-TIMERS are calling it "The Emptiest Show on Earth." You expect old-timers to be crotchety and resistant to change, but you know what? They have a point. The newly reinvented Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus attempts some major changes, and most of those changes are pretty lame if your age happens to be outside preschool range. The 136th edition of what bills itself as "The Greatest Show on Earth" opened Thursday and closed Saturday at the Oakland Arena. The circus heads to San Jose Wednesday and runs there through Aug. 27. Bypassing San Francisco's Cow Palace this year, the circus' last Bay Area stop is Stockton, Aug. 31 through Sept. 3. In "The Lord of the Rings," all the Hobbits and wizards and such jabber nonstop about "one ring to rule them all." The Ringling folks have taken that philosophy to heart. The classic three-ring circus is, at least for now, a thing of the past. This is a one-ring circus, which means the action now covers most of the arena floor. It's funny, but you don't realize how much you miss three rings until you're forced to watch a one-ring circus for two-plus hours. With three rings, there's never time to get bored by the acts because your attention is always shifting in an effort to catch every little thing. |
9 comments:
Well, I think the article is very well written! It is a sorry state of affairs that something that was as Big as the GSOE was has fallen so low! When is the light bulb going to go back on? Maybe next year with the tiger act coming on board it might start to become a Circus again instead of a stage show? We can only hope and pray!
From Eric:
When the Ghost of Circus Present (who looks like John Ringling North) visits Kenneth Feld, he will make Mr. Feld read that review aloud 10 times and then say: "And you Felds always told everybody that the Ringling Circus performance became thread-bare and tacky when I was in charge!"
CAN ANYBODY SPELL ARROGANCE?
In the New York Times, December 31, 2005, reporter Glenn Collins asked Ringling president and prodcer Kenneth Feld, "Can the name circus really be used to describe the new Ringling show?"
"Circus," Mr. Feld answered," has always been whatever the people who ran the cirus decided it will be."
With all the current speculation about the show returning to its more formal roots -- and with more and more published articles like this one from the Bay Area, I think that statement at best a big mistake. At worst a huge blast of arrogance.
Talk about arrogance!
Rather than admit they made a mistake, next year the rings with the Red Show will be replaced with three diamond shaped enclosures.
So in their relentless attempt to re-invent the wheel, they will eliminate the rings after all.
Wow--I can't believe they are changing the ring layout again! I really missed the rings this year, it just wasn't the same. It will be interesting to see how they fit the three diamonds into the arenas. I guess now that the tiger cage is in four parts they will just fit it into the diamonds. But I wonder if they will keep up the liberty horse act. It would be very unusual for the horses to work in a space of this shape--didn't Astley create the traditional circus ring for the horse? I hope they will continue to maintain some of the tradition.
-Chris
I asked my informant that very question and he said that during one meeting a suggestion was made that the diamonds might be pushed into a more circular formation for certain acts.
The single big space does work for some things like the cosaks who can do things even opening ring curbs won't allow.
I miss a flying act though (as well as not instead of the Russian Swing) and amazing as the house cats are they sure look small.
Spell arrogance? Yes, arrogance is spelt F-E-L-D.
Producers should remember: 4-year-olds never BUY TICKETS, and they will never write to the newspaper to turn-off other fans if the show is a bit over their heads.
Circus is a fun date for people 18 to 108 -- until RBBB kindergarten rap rejects and repels anyone old enough to host the outing.
Let parents explain animal care to tiny tots at home. The red show Q&A guy isn't strangled with his own socks the tenth time he wastes precious minutes lecturing only because fans fear security guards (thus making this blog the go-to place for honest feedback).
Laughlotza
Post a Comment